Small-space decision and compiler readiness audit

Family 103, source revision fd4aeeb2ee4fc729c18d98444fed42fd0529eeeb. Revised source-informed assessment, 9 October 2026 Australia/Brisbane.

Current decision

Defer a production compiler; retain a semantic/resource assurance module. Pricing, usefulness and repeatable profitable delivery are unvalidated.

Reviewed finding and application boundary

The source and challenge define binary language classes with fresh fair bits, local heads, counted traversed writable cells and all-coin polynomial randomized clocks. Twenty declared definition entries were inspected; the displayed definition/structure prefix also matches lexically after comment/whitespace removal. No intended-model mismatch was detected in this selection, and no trusted kernel/import-closure check was run.

The paper compiler takes supplied resource promises and fixes one deterministic library; it does not infer those promises or preserve a random output law. The selected formal target covers class equality, not its compiler/numerical bounds. The declared upper-bound parameters have a conservative envelope c>=2,592,016,043 and H>=2^10202. Those are loose stated bounds, not actual-runtime lower bounds or proof of impossibility. No compiler/library transition list was executed.

Evidence extent

Selected definitions/statements and the recorded manuscript sections were inspected. This is not a full manuscript, import-closure, proof or program verification. Source metadata, semantic observations, computational review.

Next action

Prepare a concrete operational-claim/benchmark control, record every model bridge and numerical error, and retain the unrestricted source construction as separately queued work. No customer outreach, paid computation or deployment has occurred.