# Small-space decision and compiler readiness audit

Family 103, source revision `fd4aeeb2ee4fc729c18d98444fed42fd0529eeeb`. Revised source-informed assessment, 9 October 2026 Australia/Brisbane.

## Current decision

Defer a production compiler; retain a semantic/resource assurance module. Pricing, usefulness and repeatable profitable delivery are unvalidated.

## Reviewed finding and application boundary

The source and challenge define binary language classes with fresh fair bits, local heads, counted traversed writable cells and all-coin polynomial randomized clocks. Twenty declared definition entries were inspected; the displayed definition/structure prefix also matches lexically after comment/whitespace removal. No intended-model mismatch was detected in this selection, and no trusted kernel/import-closure check was run.

The paper compiler takes supplied resource promises and fixes one deterministic library; it does not infer those promises or preserve a random output law. The selected formal target covers class equality, not its compiler/numerical bounds. The declared upper-bound parameters have a conservative envelope c>=2,592,016,043 and H>=2^10202. Those are loose stated bounds, not actual-runtime lower bounds or proof of impossibility. No compiler/library transition list was executed.

## Evidence extent

Selected definitions/statements and the recorded manuscript sections were inspected. This is not a full manuscript, import-closure, proof or program verification. [Source metadata](source.json), [semantic observations](../../definition-hole-review-queue-2026-10-09-v2.json), [computational review](../../../../FEASIBILITY-2026-10-09-v5.md).

## Next action

Prepare a concrete operational-claim/benchmark control, record every model bridge and numerical error, and retain the unrestricted source construction as separately queued work. No customer outreach, paid computation or deployment has occurred.