OPTIMIZATION ASSURANCE · LOCAL BROWSER REVIEW

Capacities require explicit assignments

Submitted plan passes the declared checks

Objective units: demand units × cost units per demand unit

Submitted cost
12
Best checked cost
12
Relaxed lower bound
4
Best plan independently proven optimal?
Unknown

Findings

Lower bound: Each client may use its cheapest candidate; opening count, required sites and capacities relaxed.

The best checked cost is at most 8 above the optimum. This bounds suboptimality; the actual difference from the optimum may be smaller.

Nearest-site reassignment rejected: Capacity exceeded at S0: load 4, capacity 2.

Submitted plan

Open sites: S0, S1

SiteAssigned demand
S02
S12

Assignments

ClientSite
C0S0
C1S1

Best checked plan

Open sites: S0, S1

SiteAssigned demand
S02
S12

Assignments

ClientSite
C0S0
C1S1

Scope and evidence

Exact frozen weighted assignment model only. No strict-metric/source-theorem eligibility, geographic validation or customer benefit is established.

No optimization solver ran in this browser review. It checks only the submitted plan and nearest-site alternative. Supplied provenance: Generated computational control; no customer or geographic data..

Provenance is not independently authenticated. Review sign-off: not supplied.

Generated 2026-10-09T02:12:59.247Z. Browser engine: 5d615fc81ab8caa3f7928e509f76507fcdeb31e0f54217aeeab6588edb62090e. Finite tests are not a formal program proof.