Optimization Assurance · Assignment review
Facility assignment review
Input needs correction
Objective units: unspecified × unspecified · 09 October 2026, 01:54 UTC
Submitted costNot accepted
Best checked costUnknown
Relaxed lower boundNot assessed
Best plan proven optimal?Unknown
Review findings
Input provenance
No accepted study declaration.
Supplied provenance is not independently verified.
- assignments.csv · SHA-256
07f1848832889a6d26361e48b98140460227c4619f7985c01a0e58e7a7839633 - clients.csv · SHA-256
314c9621c528501cad646eab2d6fb6d7d16dbfcfb5f1fab7212e8acbd1f86648 - costs.csv · SHA-256
9c6af6a4a52ba4349bbff8ea1527347d1b1326803d2eddb3f341b8d6de3b6bf9 - selected.csv · SHA-256
aa8bae8453188d726480f0b7fdb50f51201bbb5c3d22e30b538b37cd0e7fb729 - sites.csv · SHA-256
c5e37937add99637ca08c1825077847ab948cad1def56ee31deb2e775a19c16f - study.json · SHA-256
f2b376f10cba81f8d82e22f4ef4c06a0b32a6b9f11ff2294d4db0cc7ad7c3a53
Evidence and scope
Exact frozen weighted assignment model only. No strict-metric/source-theorem eligibility, geographic validation or customer benefit is established.
Limits: 512 clients, 128 sites, eight MiB per file, sixteen MiB combined and 128-bit rational input components. Optional solver: two seconds, one worker; exact scales capped at one million and integer range capped conservatively.
Review JSON · File manifest