Optimization Assurance · Assignment review
Generated weighted facility review
Submitted plan fails the declared constraints
Objective units: demand units × cost units per demand unit · 09 October 2026, 01:54 UTC
Submitted costNot accepted
Best checked costUnknown
Relaxed lower bound2
Best plan proven optimal?Unknown
Review findings
- Capacity exceeded at S0: load 2, capacity 1
Lower bound: Each client may use its cheapest candidate; opening count, required sites and capacities relaxed.
The nearest-site reassignment was rejected: Capacity exceeded at S0: load 2, capacity 1.
Conventional solver
Infeasible, as reported by the solver. Solver status and numerical bounds remain separate from independent optimality.
Input provenance
Generated computational control; no customer or geographic data.
Supplied provenance is not independently verified.
- assignments.csv · SHA-256
e0c7f0f08a01df41c01f47fa7068becde54bf157011f0e8ee9cb1f70f6f7d485 - clients.csv · SHA-256
e73155fa67eda2169a7b533e51b04bbbf8de50da0a11269984882d349e276a10 - costs.csv · SHA-256
e744805ab606d72ccd6a6470fd372d011cb71474de79b45ad39a48646a165be2 - selected.csv · SHA-256
e0fbf53dac7e863b9625e750aa3e48c7561139613819bdf5c91de031a8362dcb - sites.csv · SHA-256
3cad286f92b14aa7b243b33e60ea0592a992a2b57b5c7534116463ab6b8b6bc8 - study.json · SHA-256
6c3fdd6ef62f7ca9635da3d734f6ec8cd95d0c35dbadccd63efd5910676ffd1d
Evidence and scope
Exact frozen weighted assignment model only. No strict-metric/source-theorem eligibility, geographic validation or customer benefit is established.
Limits: 512 clients, 128 sites, eight MiB per file, sixteen MiB combined and 128-bit rational input components. Optional solver: two seconds, one worker; exact scales capped at one million and integer range capped conservatively.
Review JSON · File manifest