MathIdeasResearch in progressRepository ↗
← Research catalogOriginal Markdown ↓
On this page

Thermal qubit channel capacity calculator

Second edition, 9 October 2026 Australia/Brisbane. Initial decision: Prototype numerical benchmark. A working floating-point calculator now exists. Buyer demand, independent theorem verification and certified numerical error remain open.

Research finding

Family 276 states that every memoryless qubit generalized amplitude-damping channel has unassisted classical capacity equal to an attained scalar Holevo maximum. It gives equiprobable pure-state phase pairs and product ensembles. Its selected formal scope covers repeated-channel additivity and capacity, excluding arbitrary-partner additivity and separate-output measurement decoding. Manuscript, selected formal scope.

Problem and buyer

A quantum-communication R&D team needs a reproducible model-capacity reference after estimating damping and thermal population. Generic ensemble searches can be replaced by this explicit one-dimensional objective if the model and source result are accepted. A device team still needs to assess whether its observed channel fits the model.

What the finding could enable

A channel-characterization plugin can provide the model objective, a candidate maximizing signal population and sensitivity across fitted parameter ranges. A custom lab application could compare measured communication rates to the claimed asymptotic reference while preserving the collective-decoding assumption. The calculator is small enough to be an open benchmark within a larger characterization system.

Technical and commercial limits

The quantity is classical information capacity in bits per use, not quantum or secret-key capacity. The theorem assumes a memoryless channel and allows collective decoding. It does not provide a practical finite-block decoder. The current optimizer uses ordinary Python floating point, a complete finite grid and local refinement. It reports a conservative analytic grid-discretization allowance evaluated numerically, without an outward-rounded floating-point error bound. The result is not a formally certified capacity interval.

Minimal architecture

Parameter validation -> stable binary entropy -> scalar grid search -> local candidate refinement -> grid-discretization allowance -> explicit evidence labels -> channel-fit and sensitivity report. The thermal parameter nu is the stationary excited-state population; the signal parameter p is the excited-state population of sqrt(1-p)|0> ± sqrt(p)|1>.

For the average output population t=(1-gamma)p+gamma nu, the output determinant is v=gamma nu(1-nu)+gamma(1-gamma)(p-nu)^2. The objective is the entropy of the average output minus the entropy of either phase-pair output, in bits. The exact manuscript formula and channel definition were inspected before implementing it.

Existing alternatives and differentiation

Qiskit Aer already supplies a generalized amplitude-damping noise-channel constructor with Kraus matrices. That is a concrete integration target. Its documented channel construction and the new capacity objective serve different tasks; the limited documentation inspection does not prove the whole ecosystem lacks capacity calculations. The proposed value is a source-linked capacity benchmark and model-fit review. Qiskit Aer amplitude-damping API.

Monetization hypothesis

Prefer an open benchmark plus funded characterization integration, provisionally AUD 3,000–8,000 for a narrowly scoped project. At a hypothetical AUD 5,000 fee, 20 specialist hours at AUD 180/hour consume AUD 3,600 before support, sales and overhead. A standalone subscription is weak unless a buyer needs repeated channel fitting and reporting. No customer contracts or willingness-to-pay evidence exist.

Validation experiment

The prototype passed 33 analytic or direct-matrix checks: identity channels, complete replacement channels, unital channels, thermal-population symmetry, agreement with a directly constructed two-by-two output matrix and coarse-grid allowances compared with finer searches. Across three parameter pairs, none of 1,500 sampled arbitrary pure-state ensembles exceeded the scalar benchmark. This sampling is a diagnostic, not a proof of optimality.

For gamma=0.55 and nu=0.3, the best observed objective is approximately 0.3632124112 bits per use at p≈0.477789669. The 4,096-interval grid allowance is about 0.05745 bits; this conservative allowance shows that many reported decimal places are not a certified error guarantee. A tighter validated arithmetic backend would be needed for a rigorous narrow interval.

Conditions to reject or defer

Reject a broad channel-design product if measured noise is outside the model, customers need finite-block decoding, or an existing tool already supplies the desired report. Defer certified numerical intervals until rounding is controlled and defer any formally verified label until a trusted independent check runs.

Next concrete action

Add parameter-fit uncertainty, a documented solver connector and a validated arithmetic backend if a real user needs certification. Measure whether the benchmark changes a characterization decision before commercial packaging.

Runnable prototype and saved evidence

From the workspace root:

python3 research/tools/gad_capacity.py --gamma 0.55 --nu 0.3

When saving outputs, pass a fresh path with --output. Existing files are preserved through exclusive creation.